![]() |
![]() |
Jeep Accessories |
Jeep Tops |
Jeep Bumpers |
Jeep Doors |
Jeep Lift Kits |
Jeep Tires |
Jeep Rims |
Jeep Winches |
Jeep Parts
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Share | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
W5A580 Tranny,
This is the stock tranny in the 3.7L and the 6.1L? I though the tranny was better in the 4.7 & 5.7L (545RFE) engine groups? If the 545RFE is better, why is the W5A580 in the 6.1L package? Seems DC would want the heavier duty tranny behind the big engine. Which is the more HD transmission?
__________________
2000 WJ 2006 WK |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
![]() |
The requirements for towing and off-road four wheeling is somewhat different that just making it go. Neither the 3.7 or the SRT8 are rated for towing all that much. That and the SRT8 uses an entirely different transfer case.
wkjeeps has an article on the transmissions.
__________________
2006 WK Midnight Blue Limited 5.7L Hemi, REC Nav, Sirius, VES |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Counter point: The CRD uses the same tranny as the 3.7 & SRT8 and is rated to tow 7400lbs (200 more than the Hemi)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bondsville, MA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Mainly because the 3.7 GC weighs less, not because its a better tranny...
__________________
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited - Hemi 5.7L (Inferno Red/Slate/25K/Infotainment) 2004 Pontiac GTO Quicksilver/black -SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 723
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
![]() |
pre op or post op tranny?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 775
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
![]() |
__________________
06 WK Laredo Black, 4.7L, 28X, MyGig, off-road package, uconnect, sunroof, hitch, SRT8 grill & pedals Major Mods: 285/70/17's, Magnaflow Cat-back, 3" Rock Krawler lift, MyGig Lockpick conversion, SmartBeam The other car: 08 Dodge Charger Unmarked Slicktop |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bondsville, MA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Throw ten people in the jeep and then tell me if you can tow more or less...
__________________
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited - Hemi 5.7L (Inferno Red/Slate/25K/Infotainment) 2004 Pontiac GTO Quicksilver/black -SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Maybe it has to do with the gear ratios in the transmissions. The 3.7 needs a shorter (nigher numerically) first gear to get it going due to lack of power vs. the 4.7 and 5.7 HEMI's. As for the 6.1L, maybe they want the gearing shorter for the off the line jump to compete with the Cayenne Turbos of the world.
Just my 2 cents.
__________________
2005 Grand Cherokee Limited Loaded - Full AiRaid CAI, Borla Cat-Back Exhaust, JET-Flo TBI Spacer, 180 Degree T-Stat, GSM ESP Mod |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
I read (somewhere?) the MB tranny has closer gear ratios and it meant better acceleration numbers. That is why it is in the SRT. I think the 545rfe is stronger but they are both strong enough for their tasks.
__________________
'94 ZJ son's..gone at 200,000+ miles!! '98 xj daughter's traded for '04 WJ Laredo '04 wj Freedom wife's '06 WK Hemi mine all mine!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Actually they have the same tow rating - 4x2's are 7400 and 4x4's are 7200. The Dodge Ram 1500 and Durango use the 545RFE with towing up to 8950 lbs in a heavier vehicle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
I didn't catch that. Good call. There are other aspects of the Ram/Durango that allow it to tow more though: Body on frame build bends less than a unibody, spring rates, larger axle (9.25 vs 8.25), etc. Otherwise I would agree the Chrysler mated the 545RFE with more "HD" applications than the Mercedes. Another thing too, is that the Hemi's "gas mileage" would suffer from the shorter gearing as well (the 5th gear in the Merc tranny is shorter than 4th gear in the 545RFE). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|